Are you actually a teacher if you don’t have one hated educational buzz word? You know, that one that has been repeated at so many faculty meetings and professional development sessions that the word itself has lost all nuance and meaning? For me, it is the phrase “the real world” and how much emphasis is placed on having to “prepare kids for it.”
Math teacher, google consultant, and “edu twitter personality”, Alice Keeler, once tweeted this and it left me questioning my own classroom policies and expectations:
So, what is the real world? For kids, arguably, the real world is going to school for six hours a day, five days a week. That is their world and it is very much real. I’m not trying to argue that there is no value in preparing kids for life beyond schooling, but, as Mike Wesch points out in his TedTalk, What Baby George Taught Me About Learning, if everywhere else is the real world, then your classroom begins to feel like a strange fantasy land in comparison.
What I like about Wesch’s philosophy is that he takes an aspect of the “real world” -specifically, collaboration- and roots his action, lessons, and grading policies in the belief that students learn best when they are working together towards a shared goal. He argues that the conventional grading policy is a poor motivator for genuine learning because “D” and “F” students give up out of despair and “A” and “B” students give up out of complacency. Instead, he reimagines his classroom as a mountain where all students are climbers. Some students scale certain parts of the mountain with ease but those students turn around and help the others reach plateaus. In this way, the learning experience itself becomes the central focus for teachers and students.
Or, maybe the real A+ is the friends we made along the way.




